Engineering stress is defined as the force divided by what area?

Prepare for your Materials Science and Engineering Exam. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions. Each question includes hints and explanations to boost your exam readiness!

Multiple Choice

Engineering stress is defined as the force divided by what area?

Explanation:
Engineering stress is a measure of the internal force per unit area using the original cross-sectional area before loading. This keeps the stress value tied to the material’s initial geometry, so comparisons between materials don’t change as the specimen deforms or necks during testing. That’s why the correct form is force divided by the original cross-sectional area. Using the current or final area would give the true stress, which accounts for the instantaneous area as deformation progresses—this value increases when the cross-section shrinks, especially during necking. The option that corresponds to strain times modulus relates to Hooke’s law in the linear elastic region (sigma = E * epsilon), not to the definition of engineering stress itself. The option using the final area is effectively the same idea as the true stress approach, which isn’t what engineering stress uses by definition.

Engineering stress is a measure of the internal force per unit area using the original cross-sectional area before loading. This keeps the stress value tied to the material’s initial geometry, so comparisons between materials don’t change as the specimen deforms or necks during testing. That’s why the correct form is force divided by the original cross-sectional area.

Using the current or final area would give the true stress, which accounts for the instantaneous area as deformation progresses—this value increases when the cross-section shrinks, especially during necking. The option that corresponds to strain times modulus relates to Hooke’s law in the linear elastic region (sigma = E * epsilon), not to the definition of engineering stress itself. The option using the final area is effectively the same idea as the true stress approach, which isn’t what engineering stress uses by definition.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy